Christological Dimensions of Liturgy
Christian
prayer is customarily offered in the context of a special relationship
with Jesus. Prayers in the Christian tradition usually end with the
ascription, “in Jesus’ Name,” or “through Jesus Christ our Savior,” or
even with a full Trinitarian formula, “through Jesus Christ, who with
the Father and the Holy Spirit is one God, now and forever, Amen.”
Verbal forms such as these point to the traditional belief that when
Christians pray, they do not pray in a vacuum, but respond to God within
a communion established by Jesus’ relationship to God, on the one hand,
and Jesus’ relationship to humanity, on the other. As Paul puts it in
Ephesians 3:12, “in Jesus we have access to God in boldness and
confidence.” More generally, we can say that prayer in relation to Jesus
invites the pray-er into Jesus’ own relationship with God. All Christian
prayer, therefore, has a specifically Christological dimension.
This is
perhaps even more true of liturgical prayer. Liturgy is common
prayer, prayer offered in a communal and social setting, in which a
diversity of pray-ers is brought together through shared themes, shared
words, shared ritual forms, shared ceremonial actions. Because it is
social, liturgy emphasizes even more strongly that prayer happens in a
relational context, and the character pervading that context is the
character of Christ. Liturgical prayer is the prayer of the Body of
Christ gathered, and it is therefore preeminently prayer that draws its
participants into sharing the relationship between Christ and God. All
liturgy has a specifically Christological dimension.
Liturgy
can draw worshipers into sharing the relationship between Christ and
God, because liturgy represents the forms of definiteness that were
characteristic of Jesus’ life and makes them available to be experienced
in the contemporary lives of worshipers. In process-relational thought,
a thing is what it does. A thing’s existence, or a
person’s life, is a series of moments of experience; these moments are
connected to each other by certain “eternal objects”—abstract qualities
and past facts—that are reenacted from one moment to the next. A thing’s
“nature” is that constellation of eternal objects that it reenacts
consistently in its moments: my desk chair is a chair because in each
moment its molecules together reenact the quality of chairness; I
am a human being because in each moment my body, mind, psyche,
biochemistry, and so on, reenact the quality of humanness.
Traditionally, Jesus is said to have had two "natures," human and
divine; in a process-relational formulation, this can be said to mean
that Jesus in his life and ministry, his person and his work, enacted
both human and divine qualities. Jesus did what humans do, and that
makes him human; but Jesus also did what God does, and that makes
him divine. In his earthly ministry, Jesus not only proclaimed God’s
basileia, but Jesus enacted it, healing people as a sign of God’s
reign come near, liberating people from the bondage of sin and
separation, breaking down barriers between people and gathering them
into new communities characterized by the agape and compassion of
divine love. Because Jesus did what only God can do, Jesus is
God; in Jesus, humanity and divinity are not two different “substances”
that must be reconciled by some metaphysical paradox, but they are two
qualities of action that are effectively united in one person’s acting.
Christian
liturgy represents those qualities of Jesus’ acting, through symbol and
ceremony, and makes them available to become constituent elements in the
lives of worshipers today. In the liturgical reading of scripture, for
instance, stories that illustrate the divine-and-human qualities of
Jesus are read out, to be made available for reenactment in the hearing
and imagination—and action—of the hearers. Stories from the Hebrew
Scriptures that shaped Jesus’ own human consciousness are made available
to shape the consciousnesses of Jesus’ followers. In liturgical prayer,
the needs and concerns and celebrations and intercessions and petitions
and thanksgivings of the worshipers are brought into conscious
connection with the ministerial qualities of Jesus’ life and work.
Especially in the Lord’s Prayer, when worshipers reenact the specific
words of Jesus in their own hearts and voices, the qualities of Jesus’
prayer and the worshipers’ prayer are brought together, so that
contemporary worshipers do again as Jesus does. Above all, in the
celebration of the Eucharist, contemporary worshipers reenact the acts
of Christ: in the Eucharist, worshipers reenact the symbolic meal of
bread and wine which Jesus used to typify his own self-giving and
sharing love, and in that reenactment the character of Jesus’ love is
made available to characterize the worshipers’ loves as well. The
"nature" of Jesus’ love is made available to worshipers’ experience
through the symbols and ceremonies of the eucharistic action; and the
experience of that love becomes a constitutive influence in the
worshipers’ lives. Having felt Christ’s love reenacted symbolically in
liturgy, participants become more able to enact that love in their own
concrete persons and works above and beyond the liturgy.
In
liturgy, and especially in eucharistic liturgy, worshipers do again as
Jesus does. And if a thing is what it does, then in
liturgical reenactment worshipers in some real sense become
Christ. When the qualities of Christly love, exemplified in Jesus, are
renacted in worshipers praying in Jesus' Name, then the nature of Christ
is manifest in the worshipers as well.